But that’s not even the consensus position of science. · while the doc didnt exactly say adam and eve were the sole parents of humankind, the theory of evolution doesnt rule out their existence either, the daily mail reports. This adam and eve would have been just one of the many humans living on earth at the time. · in a recent book called adam and the genome, there’s a commitment to saying that humans must be homo sapiens. Can science fit with a biblical account of adam and eve? How do “ adam and eve ” fit in with evolution and the science of human origins? Such a date would put adam and eve well before the appearance of homo sapiens , making them members of an earlier homo species. Are humans homo sapiens? · was adam and eve the first humans on earth? The biblical narrative of adam and eve as the sole progenitors of humanity clashes sharply with the vast body of scientific evidence gathered across disciplines like paleontology, genetics, and anthropology. Were adam and eve the first human ancestors? However, from a scientific perspective, the question of whether they were homo sapiens involves understanding both the biblical account and the evolutionary history of our species. Traditionally, they are considered the first humans created by god. There are really several interrelated questions here. Did adam and eve live in the garden of eden? Was adam a member of the first human species? The first is whether it makes biological sense to speak of there having been “first members of the human race,” whom scripture calls “ adam ” and “ eve. ” · every indication we currently have from this kind of analysis, then, is that genetic data do in fact rule out a single pair of ancestors within the last 500,000 years. Of course, no scientists actually believe that humans descended from a single pair of humans. Who were adam and eve?
